IFPRI Discussion Papers Examine Impacts of Climate Change Adaptation and Health on Agriculture
admin - Tue, 08/10/2010

Strategies for Adapting to Climate Change in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa, International Food Policy Research Institute, July 2010

From the report: This report profiles the available climate change–related datasets and their accessibility and procurement details in the 10 ASARECA member countries. The report additionally assesses the incorporation of climate change adaptation strategies in national development plans and discusses each country’s position in the current UNFCCC negotiations. The study was conducted using a combination of extensive literature reviews and field visits to all 10 ASARECA member countries: Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda.

Access the report here.

Do Health Investments Improve Agricultural Productivity?, International Food Policy Research Institute, July 2010

From the paper: Determining the causality between health measures and both income and labor productivity remains an ongoing challenge for economists. This review paper aims to answer the question: Does improved population health lead to higher rates of agricultural growth? In attempting to answer this question, we survey the empirical literature at micro and macro levels concerning the link between health investments and agricultural productivity. The evidence from some micro-level studies suggests that inexpensive health interventions can have a very large impact on labor productivity. The macro-level evidence at the country and global level, however, is mixed at best and in some cases suggests that health care interventions have no impact on income, much less on agricultural productivity. At both micro and macro levels, the literature does not provide a clear-cut answer to the question under investigation. Overall, the review reveals a great deal of heterogeneity in terms of estimation methods, definition and measurement of health variables, choice of economic outcomes, single-equation versus multiple-equation approach, and static versus dynamic approach. The actual magnitude of estimated elasticities is difficult to assess in part due to estimation bias caused by the endogeneity of health outcomes. We also found significant gaps in the literature; for example, very little attention is given to demand for health inputs by rural populations and farmers.

Access the paper here.

Related Resources

  • BLOG

    IFPRI Discussion Paper Examines Irrigation Potential for Africa
    Wed, 08/04/2010

    IFPRI Discussion Paper Examines Irrigation Potential for Africa
    Wed, 08/04/2010

  • BLOG

    FAO, IFAD, and ILO assess gender dimensions of rural employment and poverty
    Tue, 12/14/2010

    FAO, IFAD, and ILO assess gender dimensions of rural employment and poverty
    Tue, 12/14/2010

  • BLOG

    Do Non-Tariff Barriers Impede Intra-Regional Trade in the East African Community?
    Tue, 07/28/2009

    Do Non-Tariff Barriers Impede Intra-Regional Trade in the East African Community?
    Tue, 07/28/2009

  • BLOG

    New report examines effects of international and internal ethnic borders on agricultural markets in West Africa
    Mon, 04/19/2010

    New report examines effects of international and internal ethnic borders on agricultural markets in West Africa
    Mon, 04/19/2010

  • BLOG

    Farming First Develops Guide to Regional and Global Food Security Initiatives
    Mon, 06/28/2010

    Farming First Develops Guide to Regional and Global Food Security Initiatives
    Mon, 06/28/2010